5120x1440 is a lower resolution than 4k (3840x2160) - which the 3080 runs perfectly fine let alone the 3090 Buy Samsung C49RG9 49" 32:9 120 Hz Curved FreeSync HDR VA Gaming Monitor featuring 49" Vertical Alignment (VA.

Should you upgrade to 4K or an Ultrawide 3440 x 1440 high refresh rate display? In this video I hope to illustrate the performance difference between somethi.

.

More expensive than FHD+ version. Reduced battery life. Comparing the Dell XPS 15 9520 FHD+ model against the UHD+ model no longer tells the whole story because the XPS 15 9520 also has a third.

4,391. thats a lot of pixels for your gpu to power. 4k resolution is 8.29 million pixels, this resolution is just a bit lower at 7.37 million pixels. id say youd need at least a rx 6800 or rtx 3070, if playing at native display resolution, but less if you intend to play games at low/medium settings. if value is your goal, I would consider a rx.

5120x1440 is roughly 0.9x 4K. 4K performance is what you should look at. My thinking was that if memory bandwidth is the reason why the Radeon doesn't win at 4k, there might be a break even point where the bandwidth becomes the problem - I might get lucky and the 5120x1440 resolution be below that point, making the 6800XT a better choice there.

DLSS Performance. The "poster child" of DLSS, as it embodies the basic premise of the technology with more frame rates for less effort. Allows the game to run at a lower but still solid internal resolution, and therefore has a wider super sampling range to overcome than the quality setting. Probably 1080p to 2160p in most cases, if you're.

I have a 980 Ti and would like to get an ultrawide monitor. Will there be a big performance hit in FPS between 16:9 and 21:9. So basically 3440x1440 vs 2560x1440.

I use a Samsung CRG9 for work and gaming. It's basically a 2x 27" setup without bezels (you can split the monitor into two virtual monitors if you care). Pretty happy with it. Way better for viewing large tabular data or similar due to no bezel. DPI is fine at 1 meter distance with my vision (5120x1440 49" ultrawide).

When we bump up the settings to High, for example, the RTX 3070 quickly starts delivering an average closer to 50fps in today's big games, while the RTX 3080 is, for the most part, still well above 60fps, maintaining a 15-20fps lead over its RTX sibling. Again, Assassin's Creed Valhalla remains a tough nut to crack at 4K, averaging 58fps on the.

4,391. thats a lot of pixels for your gpu to power. 4k resolution is 8.29 million pixels, this resolution is just a bit lower at 7.37 million pixels. id say youd need at least a rx 6800 or rtx 3070, if playing at native display resolution, but less if you intend to play games at low/medium settings. if value is your goal, I would consider a rx.